Electrophysiological correlates of interference control at retrieval predict performance on a subsequent analogical reasoning task.

Previous research has shown that variations in the accessibility of relevant information that stem from retrieval practice may impair analogical reasoning. In the present study, we sought to examine the neural signatures of inhibitory control during selective retrieval and its effects on a subsequent analogical reasoning task by employing electrophysiological measures. At a behavioral level, we found that selective retrieval of a subset of potential solutions led to impaired performance on the analogy test. ERPs analyses during selective retrieval revealed that (1) the repeated presentation of retrieval cues was associated with decreased amplitudes for the FN400 ERP effect, possibly reflecting reduced reactivation of competitor associates and interference across retrieval attempts; (2) this effect correlated positively with the retrieval-related impairment in analogical reasoning performance. During the analogy test, the production of control solutions (non-affected by prior retrieval practice) was characterized by more positive modulations of anterior frontal and parietal ERPs than the production of unstudied solutions, whereas inhibited solutions elicited similar amplitudes to unstudied solutions. This effect was restricted to the retrieval phase of the analogy where the actual solutions had to be retrieved, but it did not affect the mapping phase where the accessibility status of the possible solutions failed to reveal significant amplitude differences. These findings suggest that control during selective retrieval may lead to the downregulation of competing memory representations and advance our understanding of the neural correlates of analogical thinking.

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex cancels out the cost of selective retrieval on subsequent analogical reasoning.

Analogical reasoning involves mapping the relation between two concepts within a specific field into a new domain to selectively retrieve a possible solution. Neuroimaging studies have shown that both selective retrieval and reasoning by analogy are related to activity in prefrontal regions such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In the present study, we investigate the role of the right DLPFC in modulating memory accessibility and its impact on analogical reasoning by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Participants performed a four-term reasoning task after performing repeated selective retrieval of previously presented items, some of which could be used as solutions in the analogical test. During selective retrieval, half of the participants received cathodal tDCS over the right DLPFC and the other half received sham stimulation. The results reveal that whereas the sham group showed the expected cost in performance that is associated with selective retrieval, the cathodal group did not exhibit such an impairment in reasoning. No general effects of tDCS on analogical performance were observed. Altogether, our results support the involvement of the right DLPFC as a core component of a control network that selectively contributes to the retrieval component of analogical reasoning, but with little role in mapping relations between different domains.

Inhibitory control during selective retrieval may hinder subsequent analogical thinking.

Analogical reasoning is a complex cognitive activity that involves access and retrieval of pre-existing knowledge in order to find a suitable solution. Prior work has shown that analogical transfer and reasoning can be influenced by unconscious activation of relevant information. Based on this idea, we report two experiments that examine whether reduced access to relevant information in memory may further disrupt analogical reasoning unwittingly. In both experiments, we use an adaptation of the retrieval practice paradigm [1] to modulate memory accessibility of potential solutions to a subsequent set of analogy problems of the type 'A is to B as C is to ?'. Experiment 1 showed a retrieval-induced impairment in analogical problem solving. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and demonstrated that it cannot be due to the deliberative episodic retrieval of the solutions to the analogies. These findings, predictable from an inhibitory framework of memory control, provide a new focus for theories of analogical transfer and highlight the importance of unconscious memory processes that may modulate problem solving.

Papel de la oxitocina en la regulación de la agresión / Role of oxytocin in the regulation of aggression

La oxitocina (Oxt) es un neuropéptido especialmente relevante por su implicación en las conductas sociales y de afiliación, incluyendo la regulación de la conducta agresiva. En este artículo presentamos una revisión actualizada que examina la relación entre la Oxt y la agresión en modelos animales. La recopilación de artículos se realizó a través de una búsqueda combinada en las bases de datos Web of Knowledge, Scopus y Pubmed (1990-septiembre 2016). Los resultados de estos estudios incluyen evidencias que proceden de la administración de Oxt intranasal, intracerebral, intracerebroventricular, o sus antagonistas, de estudios de lesión, microdiálisis, así como de trabajos con animales modificados genéticamente. En conjunto, los resultados indican que tanto en roedores machos como en hembras la Oxt modula la agresión, aunque no siempre lo hace en el mismo sentido. Se concluye que en la agresión ofensiva la Oxt ejerce generalmente un papel inhibitorio sobre la agresión, mientras que en la agresión maternal se ha observado tanto un papel facilitador como inhibidor, dependiendo de diferentes factores. Se sugiere la necesidad de analizar las variables contextuales e individuales que podrían estar modulando la acción de la Oxt sobre la agresión (AU)

Oxytocin (Oxt) is a neuropeptide particularly relevant for its involvement in social and affiliation behaviours, including the regulation of aggressive behaviours. An updated review is presented, examining the relationships between oxytocin and aggression in animal models. The articles for review were gathered using a combined search on Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PubMed databases (from 1990 to September 2016). The results of these studies include evidence derived from intranasal, intraventricular and intra-cerebro-ventricular Oxt administration, or from antagonist drugs, lesion studies, microdialysis, as well as works with genetically modified animals. Overall, the results indicate that Oxt modulates aggression both in male and female rodents, although it does not always act in the same direction. It is concluded that Oxt generally exerts an inhibitory role in offensive aggression, whereas in maternal aggression both a facilitating as well as an inhibitor role has been observed, depending on different factors. It is suggested that there is a need to analyse the contextual and individual variables that might be modulating the Oxt action in aggression (AU)